England skipper Ben Stokes has been pumped up since the start of fifth day’s play at Lord’s, and former pacer Stuart Broad believes India’s targeted tactics against Zak Crawley on Day 3 of the ongoing Test may have triggered the spark.
Stokes, who delivered the final over on Day 4, came up with a marathon spell on the final day. Despite being an injury-prone player in recent years, Stokes pushed his body, holding one end tightly while Jofra Archer ran through the Indian top-order.
Speaking on Sky Sports Cricket, Broad suggested that Stokes was motivated by India’s aggressive approach towards Crawley at the stroke of stumps on Day 3.
After Jasprit Bumrah bowled five deliveries in what was expected to be a two-over burst, Crawley called for the physio, prompting Indian players to accuse him of time-wasting. Skipper Shubman Gill exchanged heated words with the lanky opener as tempers flared.
“What would have fired him up in this game was the Indian team targeting Zak Crawley in that one over,” Broad said. “It was great fun, brilliant to watch, but he wouldn't have liked the fact that one of his players was out there alone, with just Ben Duckett for company, and the team going at him.”
Broad also highlighted the increased verbal energy from the England players since then. “I can't remember the last time I’ve seen this England team this verbal. Archer bowls the bouncer to Reddy—duck, bang—everyone’s around him, letting him know he’s under pressure. That was ignited.”
The aggression has provided the much-needed competitive edge to the game. Broad believes Stokes is leading from the front in injecting energy into the side.
“Stokes is bowling and chatting, telling the batters they’re under pressure, inviting them to drive. He’s creating a mental battle and trying to shift the Indian mindset. His team is right there with him.”
Ben Stokes had already completed 24 overs in India’s second innings by Tea on Day 5. He also claimed three wickets, including the prized scalp of KL Rahul.
India were 163/9 at Tea, requiring 30 more runs to win the Lord’s Test. On the other hand, the hosts needed just one wicket to seal the deal.
