Sethi called the BCCI a bully and stated that ICC needs to be reformed.
His words provide further context for Pakistan's decision to explore a boycott, which has prompted fears of punishment from the International Cricket Council (ICC).
Pakistan's attitude, expressed in a formal government statement, is commonly interpreted as a political protest rather than a simple sports decision. The move is related to Bangladesh's withdrawal from the event after the ICC denied their request to move matches from India to Sri Lanka, citing security concerns.
The impact has put the event under strain, especially since the India-Pakistan match, widely regarded as the biggest draw in international cricket, is now questionable.
The ICC has already reportedly warned the Pakistan Cricket Board that a boycott of the high-profile match might result in harsh consequences. The governing body has also stated that such a move would not be in the best interests of the game, given the sporting and economic value of an India-Pakistan match.
Najam Sethi believes the issue is still salvageable.
“From my point of view, if Bangladesh can be invited to Sri Lanka, it’s not too late. There are many matches being played there,” Sethi told India Today.
According to Sethi, if Bangladesh continues to refuse to participate despite being offered such an alternative, other remaining issues must be addressed by stakeholders.
“I’m hoping good sense prevails. Everyone wants to see India versus Pakistan. It’s the gold standard,” he added.
He also indicated that the current PCB leadership had considered every possible result.
“They’ve consulted lawyers here and abroad. They’re comfortable with the decision,” Sethi said, suggesting Pakistan’s stance is not impulsive.
In response to criticism over the timing of Pakistan's protest, Sethi explained why Pakistan is boycotting now, given that Bangladesh is the directly affected party. He accused BCCI of routinely intimidating other bodies.
“The issue is the BCCI’s attitude. At every stage, they have bullied other boards. Earlier, Pakistan was isolated—one among ten—and everyone sided with India. Now that’s changing,” he added.
Sethi recalled Pakistan's opposition to the divisive "Big Three" paradigm, which concentrated power and revenue in India, Australia, and England.
“Nine boards signed up; we stood alone because it was inequitable,” he said.
Although adjustments were eventually made and India agreed to play a bilateral series with Pakistan, Sethi detailed how the accord failed at the last minute.
“A year later, on the eve of the series, the BCCI pulled out without even meeting us in Mumbai. That was a huge insult,” he said.
According to Sethi, the current standoff represents a turning point. Sethi admitted that the strategy might result in immediate setbacks, such as missing out on the largest rivalry in the sport. But he presented the demonstration as a component of a greater goal.
“Now Bangladesh has also been snubbed. Together, Pakistan and Bangladesh represent 400 million people. This is the moment to stand up. There may be short-term losses, but the goal is a reformed ICC,” he said.
Sethi conceded that if no resolution is reached, the dispute could spill into legal territory.
“Worst-case scenarios end up in courts, and that’s where lawyers have their day,” he said.
India and Pakistan are slated to clash on February 15 in Colombo in the T20 World Cup 2026.
(India Today)