Virat Kohli dragged into ‘conflict of interest’ row after MPCA member Sanjeev Gupta’s complaint

Gupta has sent a mail to BCCI ethics officer, claiming Kohli's business ventures are in violation of the Lodha Panel recommendations.

By Salman Anjum - 05 Jul, 2020

The ‘conflict of interest’ has become a major topic of discussion within the Indian cricket fraternity in the last couple of years and skipper Virat Kohli seems to be the latest victim of it.

See Also: "Some people are always negative in life," Kapil Dev slams conflict of interest rules after CAC exit

In a mail to Ethics Officer DK Jain, which has been accessed by IANS, a member of the Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association – Sanjeev Gupta – has spoken about Kohli's business ventures and said it seems that it is in violation of the Lodha Panel recommendations that were approved by the Supreme Court while the new BCCI Constitution was registered.

"Virat Kohli is occupying two posts at a time in blatant violation to BCCI Rule 38(4) approved by Supreme Court Of India , As such, he must relinquish his one post at once in compliance, his two posts are covered as under - A - 38(4)(a) - Player. B - 38(4)( o ) - Contractual Entity , to be read with BCCI Rule 38(1) (iii).

"I humbly solicit Learned Ethics Officer to forthwith pass the order directing Virat Kohli to give away one of his post , at once, in compliance to BCCI Constitution dated 21.08.18 Rule Number 38(4) (Approved by Apex Court).

"My sole pure intent behind filing each & every precise/factual complaint is for 100 % compliance of Lodha Reforms & Supreme Court approved BCCI Constitution without any personal agenda & without any vested interest . I am least bothered about the persona/aura of the individual, as I am only bothered for 100 % compliance. No individual, how Rich / Big / Influential / Powerful one is, can never be above the law of the Land. "The Supreme Court" verdict , every body has to Respect , Accept & 100 % comply forthwith & fall in line.

"Nothing to attain & nothing of mine at stake, it is Supreme Court verdicts sanctity & compliance at stake for which I am all alone combating day in & day out for last 4 years & will continue to do so till my mind & body will support said noble cause/intent without any fear / favour / influence / assistance / influence , I have not & will not leave any stone unturned for the same," he wrote.

Gupta, in his mail, has pointed out the Indian captain's association with VIRAT KOHLI SPORTS LLP company, which has two Directors/Owners namely Virat Kohli & Amit Arun Sajdeh, and CORNERSTONE VENTURE PARTNERS LLP, which has three Directors/Owners namely Virat Kohli, Amit Arun Sajdeh and Binoy Bharat Khimji.

It is not the first time that Sanjeev Gupta has raised the ‘conflict of interest’ issue. He has previously registered complaints against the likes of Sourav Ganguly, Rahul Dravid, Ravi Shastri among others and they had to relinquish multiple posts.

Speaking to IANS about the complaints, a BCCI executive said this is a clear effort to create nuisance and blackmail those who have served the nation with aplomb.

"One look at the complaint email and you know it is motivated. Someone is clearly trying to attack the office bearers of the BCCI and now the captain of Indian team for some hidden reason. With what has happened over the last 6 years, this pattern is clearly visible. I mean just see at the number of addressees on the email and the language, the intention is clearly to scream off the rooftops to malign people who are successful. There''s clearly some motivation. For these kinds of complaints the concept of locus standii should be a necessity. Otherwise there will be no end to nuisance and blackmail," the executive pointed.

Sources close to the Indian captain said that the whole turn of events is sad.

"Our cricketers have a shelf life and they have to earn what they can during that period. Such kind of malicious complaints will start playing on their minds and performances will suffer. Such people are only interested in publicity with no care for the impact such insinuations can have on the players and their families. These complications are not good for the game and only give rise to babudom," he rued.

(With IANS inputs)

By Salman Anjum - 05 Jul, 2020

TAGS