The Pataudi Trophy was renamed to Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy before the India-England Test series.
The England Cricket Board (ECB) decided to present the Pataudi medal to the winning captain instead after major criticism from both fans as well as experts.
Days after the end of the five-match Test series, which ended in a 2-2 draw, Ghavri slammed the BCCI and even Tendulkar for not taking a firm stand against the change of the series name.
He even mentioned Sunil Gavaskar, citing that if the name of Border-Gavaskar Trophy would have been changed then the former opener "would have shaken the whole India".
"That is very wrong. Number one, the Australia-West Indies series is always called the Frank Worrell Trophy. The India-Australia Trophy is always called the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. If its name changed, Gavaskar poore India ko hila ke rakh dega (Gavaskar will shake the whole of India)," Ghavri told Vicky Lalwani on the latter's YouTube channel.
"The BCCI should've put its foot down with the MCC and the ECB. Tiger's name shouldn't have been removed," he added.
Ghavri was critical of Sachin for not honouring the stature of Pataudi. "In the same context, when it came to Sachin Tendulkar, that this trophy would be changed, and this trophy would be named after you and Anderson, Sachin should've said no. Objection is different," said Ghavri.
"In the first place, you should've put your foot down and should've said 'No, I don't want to use my name because Tiger Pataudi's name is already there. He's a legend of Indian cricket. If you want to give medals, use our name. Trophy's name should remain the same'. First of all, this question should've never been raised. You're degrading somebody of a great stature," he added.
India won the fifth and final Test against England at the Oval by a narrow margin of six runs to level the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy at 2-2.
When the Shubman Gill-led side landed in England, no one gave the tourists a chance following the retirements of Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli and Ravichandran Ashwin from the longest format. But the team in transition proved everyone wrong as they gave the hosts a run of their money in all five Test matches.